The Difference

Why I Hired a Professional
Same Wedding. Same Moment. Same lighting. Same Editing Programs. Same Camera!
These pictures were shot feet apart at almost the same exact moment with identical cameras and very similar lenses.
Why the big difference?
The one on the left was shot by a photographer with hours and hours of experience, thorough camera knowledge and solid photography training.

the one on the right was shot by your friend . . . with a great camera.

______________________________________________________

I'd like to follow up our guest blog from NYC photographer G.E. Masana with a few comments of my own. Above is a photo I came across on Facebook, and I cannot tell you how true it rings. Last September my website designer - who is a also a Professional photographer - and I attended the National Association of Wedding Professionals Fall meeting in Madison, WI. The featured speaker was nationally known wedding marketing expert Rick Brewer. During his presentation he commented that no one has taken it in the shorts in the digital age more so than the photography industry. It seems anyone who has a Best Buy credit card, access to a computer and can go to Vista Print and get 250 free business cards can instantly qualify themselves as a 'professional' photographer.

Let me make this point though - and this comes from someone with 20+ years experience in the wedding industry:

They're not the same.
They're not the same.
They're not the same.

Last year after our first 30 weddings we worked with 27 different photographers, many of them who you could tell were making their first trip to the rodeo. We encountered:

• A bride and groom who went behind the cake for that cake cutting moment, only to discover that there was no knife and server. It was actually in front of the cake in plain site of the photographer but she just stood there, not knowing what to do. The bride and groom just stood there, unsure themselves. Finally,  after what seemed to be a long awkward moment of confusion, I grabbed  my microphone to let them know where the knife/server were but a guest realized the dilemma and fetched the utensils for the newlyweds.
• A photographer who was fortunate enough to get seated right at the edge of the dance floor for dinner, and then when those first dances came up she just swung around and took pictures of the historic moment right from her chair. She never even got up!
• Then there was the guy we had to go fetch from outside when we needed him. Apparently he was too busy smoking and schmoozing with the bridesmaids. He was also the guy who ran over to the buffet to be the first in line.
• And finally the 'professional' photographer who announced to me that we had to do all of the wedding traditions right away because she did not have a car and her husband was picking her up at 8pm.

I could go on, but if that is not enough to convince you that a professional photographer is worth the extra $$ look again at the picture up above. Which one evokes an emotion you want to leave your family, friends and future children with? If this is your second (or more) wedding than I can understand being a bit more conservative with expenditures. But if this is your one-and-only wedding, wouldn't you want keepsake memories that you can be proud of for years and years to come?

end of rant

Until next time,

~ Mike ~

Should You See Each Other Before Your Ceremony -- Or Not?

The following is a guest post from from NYC photographer G.E. Masana

Sure, it was an ancient superstition that bad luck would soon follow if the groom saw the bride in her gown before the wedding. And in today's modern world some couples still wrangle over the question whether to see each other prior to their ceremony -- but mostly for other reasons.

It's safe to say that most of the world's weddings couples already see each other as part of the wedding day process. In many cultures and religions, couples meet before the ceremony for rituals such as tea ceremonies, ketubah signings and garland ceremonies... and bad luck doesn't necessarily follow (upon further investigation it turns out if bad luck does follow it's always because of something that happened when the bride and groom saw each other after the wedding, not before. But I digress).

Yet other brides weigh in on the question citing tradition or talk about wanting to keep the mystique. Still, meeting earlier for photos does get you to your party sooner.

But there's one even bigger aspect to seeing each other prior to the ceremony that never seems to get talked about although it makes the biggest difference to the couple. And it's not about making more time for a cocktail hour or having "that" moment when she walks down the aisle.

No, it's about something bigger than all that. Something far more meaningful to the couple. Two things, actually. So let me show you what they are.

Even though I've photographed hundreds of weddings (I stopped counting at about 1,000) I've seen this over and over again. Here at this particular wedding (shown below), the bride and groom weren't going to see each other prior to the ceremony because they wanted to keep to "tradition" and they wanted to make that moment when they first saw each other, special.

But at the very last minute they had a change of heart.

That change of heart came because the time they had scheduled for photos after their ceremony was restrictive and also conflicted with their cocktail hour. And they wanted to have sufficient time to create great images. And they wanted to enjoy their cocktail hour. So they went ahead, somewhat reluctantly, and planned to do a "First Look."

By the way, I've often noticed that while many times people schedule their portrait session at the same time as their cocktail hour, no two other events of the wedding day are ever simultaneously scheduled. So let me propose we start now a new trend where the ceremony and the cocktail hour are scheduled for the same time. I believe guests may enjoy a cocktail or two and an appetizer while watching you two get married. Don't you? So please run this idea past your wedding coordinator and even if he or she says no, ignore them and let's get this thing going! Be the first one on your block. Be a trendsetter.

Back to my story. This couple met up earlier on their wedding day for their "First Look." And so they got "that" moment, in fact they were immersed in that OMG moment in a way they couldn't have been if the ceremony was happening. They enjoyed this alone time more privately away from the crowd, were free to enjoy sweet sentimental moments together... all good. Which by the way also makes for some special memories. And photo opportunities.

In fact you can see how high their emotions ran right here in the seconds before their First Look:

Obviously, meeting earlier free from the needs of the ceremony gives you more personal moments and experiences, adding memories to your day. Good stuff.

Everything that happens during the First Look is a unique experience you wouldn't have had if you didn't take that opportunity to be with each other. And that's the first plus I wanted to tell you about.

But now, afterwards, when it came time for their ceremony -- do you think the time they spent together earlier took any shine off the magic?

Well I need to tell you, it sure didn't.

Though he had spent an hour with her already, here's the photo I took when his bride made her appearance at the top of the aisle. Check out the expression on his face:

His eyes are tearing up. His lip is quivering. He's feeling it. And since I was there taking that photo I can tell you when she turned the corner and came into view -- these two immediately locked eyes on each other. They were beyond riveted with each other.

It was as if there wasn't a single other soul in the crowd -- despite the fact there was a huge throng of guests packed between them. Didn't matter. His eyes were only on her. And hers were only on him. 

You could literally feel their energy.

Now you may think that the moral of my little story is "and so Dear Reader, having a First Look doesn't take away the magic later" and that is the second point I wanted to tell you about. But it isn't.

This is:

I realized spending that quality, personal time together earlier on in the wedding day ramps up and fuels the emotions for when the magic moment finally comes when you see each other at your ceremony.
It can add more anticipation, electricity and passion to your ceremony. Because it adds it to your heart first.
All of which gives you many more unique moments of your day to experience, more emotions for you to bask in -- and many more memories for you to cherish.

ABOUT G.E. MASANA

Probably the only wedding photographer in NYC coming from the art world, G.E. Masana's (gemasana.com) roster of wedding clients have included, among many others, Vanessa Penna (Beauty Editor, ELLE), Kelly Keskes (Model, BRIDAL GUIDE), Jen Chapin (daughter of legendary singer-songwriter Harry Chapin), Barrie Gillies (BRIDES magazine), Gaines Peyton (SEARS-PEYTON GALLERY, NYC), Evan Galbraith (son of E. Galbraith, Ambassador to France), Craig Kanarick (CCO, RAZORFISH), assorted art directors, actors, opera singers, cinematographers, fashion designers, graphic artists and photographers.

He's been seen in BRIDES, BRIDAL GUIDE, TOWN & COUNTRY, NEW YORK MAGAZINE, STYLE ME PRETTY as well as other magazines and blogs. He currently writes about weddings for HUFFINGTON POST and served on "The List" of contributing photographers for MARTHA STEWART WEDDINGS.

He's been interviewed by the two leading international professional wedding photography journals, RANGEFINDER and STUDIO PHOTOGRAPHY. Recently he was awarded by the INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL WEDDING PHOTOGRAPHERS for his wedding documentary photography. You can see more of his work at GEMASANA.COM